• 高校在陕招生出新政 快来看有没有你想报考的学校招生计划高校-西安新闻 2019-06-19
  • 热巴窦骁携手演绎经典神话 2019-06-16
  • 两场比赛5名球员梅开二度 巴萨皇马大胜 2019-06-16
  • 贪官的可恨之处,不在于他们的贪污、索贿、受贿、侵占国有资财,而在于他们相互勾结,打压、排挤积极认真为党、国家、民族、人民工作的好干部。向他们靠拢就被拉拢、腐蚀变 2019-06-14
  • 秦存良的专栏作者中国国家地理网 2019-06-12
  • 网传的高考零分作文都是假的 阅卷老师:题目写对就有2分 2019-06-12
  • 邢台财富家园小区物业乱收费已解决 2019-06-09
  • 外交部:文莱外交与贸易部第二部长艾瑞万将访华 2019-06-09
  • 采用承载式车身 曝上汽大通全新SUV谍照 2019-06-08
  • China Focus Dragon Boat Festival celebrated across China - Culture News - CQNEWS 2019-06-07
  • “他想占我便宜!”女孩拼车路上求救,家人到时司机裸着下身… 2019-06-06
  • 您访问的页面找不回来了 2019-06-05
  • 这支神奇冰岛队里都是邻居 扑出梅西点球的门将还是导演 2019-06-05
  • 紫光阁中共中央国家机关工作委员会 2019-06-04
  • 足球界最丑十大球星:小罗第4!鲁尼第3 里贝里仅第6! ——凤凰网房产 2019-06-03
  • Political correctness pervades US media

    By Wu Ying Source:Global Times Published: 2019/3/18 18:23:39

    The term "political correctness" originated as a legal concept in 19th century America, gradually finding its way into expressions of race, class and gender. The term has turned into a value that promotes tolerance and avoids discrimination. However, its meaning has become more inclusive. 

    It is considered "politically incorrect" as long as any act does not cater to mainstream public opinion. Meanwhile, with the great cultural influence of the US, "political correctness" has spread across borders to enter other Western societies. For example, being against Russia is considered "political correctness" in many Western countries. In order to be politically correct, the US Embassy in China even criticized the Communist Party of China on Chinese social media network Weibo. Suddenly, "political correctness" has become a tool for American media to silence differing opinions.

    Confucius Institute is pushed to the forefront in China-US economic relations. In the wake of the trade war, attacking Confucius Institutes reflects a mind-set of "political correctness" embedded in US society. Recently, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released two reports on Confucius Institutes. Some US media outlets quickly followed up. The expansion of China's soft power finds frequent mention in American and European media reports on Confucius Institutes, while little is said about the promotion of Goethe Institute by Germany and Cervantes Institute by Spain. 

    There are 96 Confucius Institutes in the US and more than 500 Confucius Institutes and 1,000 Confucius classrooms around the world. Chinese has become the second most-learned foreign language in the US, and the number of American primary and secondary school students studying Putonghua is growing rapidly. Amid the trade conflict, the undue spotlight on Confucius Institutes reflects not only the US' worries on Chinese economic development but also concerns for its own "cultural security."

    "Political correctness" has combined with the "China threat theory." As China develops, the "China threat theory" has taken center stage in the West. Along with the improvement of China's soft power, skepticism about Chinese cultural and technological development mirrors the static mind-set of "political correctness." "Charm offensive," "sharp power" and "cultural spy" have become much-paraded words. US media has framed Confucius Institutes in the backdrop of the "China threat." The US media criticized Confucius Institutes for catering to mainstream American values. This seems paradoxical. Daily Telegraph of the UK pointed that "China threat is vastly overstated." Miami University in the US said in a news article, "This was a politically-motivated probe and it continues to perpetuate a narrative of 'us vs. them' instead of one about bridging cultural divides." 

    Objectiveness and balance are absent, methods and subjects are vague in American media reports on Confucius Institutes. The PSI report and the GAO report came to contradictory conclusions on issues like autonomy and academic freedom of Confucius Institutes. The GAO report put paid to conclusions in the PSI report, which said Confucius Institutes compromised academic freedom of US universities and lacked transparency. The PSI report also said that Confucius Institutes were engaged in espionage and threatened US national security, without any evidence. Although US media claimed objectivity, they selected negative aspect in the reports. In fact, the GAO report said that cooperation with Chinese universities should continue. 

    Whether the US media are liberal or conservative, their international reports follow the "America First" principle rather than their self-professed professionalism. In case of Confucius Institutes, the US media generated discourse that met US national interests. The GAO report showed that there was no evidence that staff of Confucius Institutes were involved in espionage, while the media call Confucius Institute a "cultural spy." The report showed concern over eroding academic freedom, while the media accused Confucius Institutes of influencing US public opinion and even seeking "ideological colonization." 

    "Spiral of silence" hits cultural communication and convergence. The term "spiral of silence" means that people tend to remain silent when they feel that their views are against the majority view on a subject. As the opinion finds more support among the majority, the minority continues to be threatened and sinks deeper into silence. Confucius Institutes are questioned worldwide because of their official affiliation. However, these doubts mainly come from the elite opinion in the US and European countries. For the public in the international community, especially Chinese language learners, Confucius Institutes bring opportunities and cultural exchanges. This is precisely the reason why on the one hand Confucius Institutes have been closed in some countries, while on the other many countries are waiting to cooperate with Chinese universities. 

    There were many reasons to explain why the US media chose only negative information for reporting: National interest, communication concerns and cross-culture barriers all contributed to the practice. Just as American editors favor news of disasters, wars, and disease when reporting on Africa, positive information on Confucius Institutes is bound to be filtered out and suppressed. 

    The management of Confucius Institutes needs improvement, but biased public opinion is detrimental to cultural communication. Political correctness was originally intended to prevent cultural clashes caused by discriminatory language, but it has gone to the extreme in recent years. US domestic issues have suffered because of political correctness. In the US media's coverage on Confucius Institutes, the content selection is hijacked by American mainstream public opinion and values. Other views are difficult to voice under the "spiral of silence" effect. 

    The author is a professor at the School of Journalism and Communication, Shanghai International Studies University. [email protected] 



    Posted in: VIEWPOINT

  • 高校在陕招生出新政 快来看有没有你想报考的学校招生计划高校-西安新闻 2019-06-19
  • 热巴窦骁携手演绎经典神话 2019-06-16
  • 两场比赛5名球员梅开二度 巴萨皇马大胜 2019-06-16
  • 贪官的可恨之处,不在于他们的贪污、索贿、受贿、侵占国有资财,而在于他们相互勾结,打压、排挤积极认真为党、国家、民族、人民工作的好干部。向他们靠拢就被拉拢、腐蚀变 2019-06-14
  • 秦存良的专栏作者中国国家地理网 2019-06-12
  • 网传的高考零分作文都是假的 阅卷老师:题目写对就有2分 2019-06-12
  • 邢台财富家园小区物业乱收费已解决 2019-06-09
  • 外交部:文莱外交与贸易部第二部长艾瑞万将访华 2019-06-09
  • 采用承载式车身 曝上汽大通全新SUV谍照 2019-06-08
  • China Focus Dragon Boat Festival celebrated across China - Culture News - CQNEWS 2019-06-07
  • “他想占我便宜!”女孩拼车路上求救,家人到时司机裸着下身… 2019-06-06
  • 您访问的页面找不回来了 2019-06-05
  • 这支神奇冰岛队里都是邻居 扑出梅西点球的门将还是导演 2019-06-05
  • 紫光阁中共中央国家机关工作委员会 2019-06-04
  • 足球界最丑十大球星:小罗第4!鲁尼第3 里贝里仅第6! ——凤凰网房产 2019-06-03
  • 湖北11选5开奖图 西甲阿拉维斯球衣 河南泳坛夺金玩法实例 夹猪珠登陆 vs马德里竞技国王杯首发球员 巴萨罗纳皇家社会 手机版绝地求生看不到自己画面 街头乐队游戏 猴子基诺闯关 古墓奇兵真人板