• 省国资运营公司机关召开党员大会选举产生第一届机关党委委员 2019-08-15
  • 中宣部授予张黎明“时代楷模”称号 2019-08-15
  • 工信部下架46款不良手机APP 2019-08-09
  • 草原生态文化如何传承 2019-08-09
  • 【专题】书记、市长去哪儿 2019-08-02
  • 人工智能机遇与挑战 听听专家怎么说 2019-08-02
  • [网连中国]赛龙舟 包粽子 办诗会……全国各地品民俗迎端午 2019-07-30
  • 国防部回应美舰擅入西沙领海:中国军队当即行动予以驱离 2019-07-25
  • 出租广州市海珠区新港东路磨碟沙大街118号之52号自编C-7A、C-8A、C-6A、C-9A、C-8B、C-6B、C-9B、C-5B、C-10B、C-7B(即自编10栋部分物业) 2019-07-25
  • 挖鼻孔会导致鼻孔变大吗?鼻孔千万别想挖就挖 2019-07-19
  • 香港支付方式日渐丰富(看香港) 2019-07-19
  • 鸟瞰“中国围屋之乡” 造型独特如城堡 2019-07-18
  • 这个问题,不是我们那些学者所讲的,国家崛起美国害怕了。而是美国舞着大棒,配合国内的资本共同讹诈。 2019-07-12
  • 你遇到了吗用户吐槽升iOS 11.4后耗电过快用户吐槽升iOS11后耗电过快-行情资讯 2019-07-12
  • 高校在陕招生出新政 快来看有没有你想报考的学校招生计划高校-西安新闻 2019-06-19
  • US in strategic mire on overseas military cost

    By Zuo Xiying Source:Global Times Published: 2019/3/17 16:58:39

    Illustration: Liu Rui/GT


    Distribution of defense spending has been an important and long-lasting source of dispute between the US and its allies. How to share the cost of US overseas military presence is the bone of contention. After US President Donald Trump came to power, he took issue with US defense expenditure abroad, increasing pressure on its allies to pare it. The Trump administration has urged NATO members as well as Japan and South Korea to ramp up their defense spending. 

    The Trump administration is drawing up a "Cost Plus 50" formula, which lays down that countries "hosting US troops pay the full price of American soldiers deployed on their soil - plus 50 percent or more for the privilege of hosting them." This will lead to a significant rise in German and South Korean military spending. 

    The cost for South Korea which hosts 28,500 US soldiers has increased from $150 million in 1991 to an expected $924 million in 2019. Meanwhile, Germany currently needs to annually spend $1 billion, roughly 28 percent of the total cost, on about 35,000 US soldiers. 

    In fact, Trump's complaint against the burden of sharing military expenditure reflects a long-term strategic dilemma of US military presence abroad. After WWII, a rich and powerful US offered strategic protection to NATO members and its Asia-Pacific allies. Although these allies became economically stronger, they still rely heavily on Washington for their defense. In other words, these countries didn't adapt to changing defense needs and their military capabilities to assume commensurate defense responsibility. What's worse for the US is that these allies have been pampered and have formed their unique strategic culture. 

    As Robert Kagan observed in the book, Of Paradise and Power, due to the power gap between US and Europe, the two sides judged external threats differently that led to divergent views on international principles. This led to Europe paying less attention to defense matters. 

    There are two reasons why Trump made such demands on allies. First, it's the way Trump is - his preferences and style. He cannot accept allies taking advantage of the US. In Trump's opinion, US allies are wealthy countries that should spend more. 

    Second, a fresh geopolitical challenge has sprung up. Russia's activities in Europe in recent years have triggered concern and alarmed some Eastern European countries, prompting the Trump administration to reconsider how to deal with the situation. Under the "America First" policy, it is incumbent upon allies to assume more responsibility for their defense expenditure. The situation is similar in the Western Pacific, where the US faces a rapidly rising China and a reckless North Korea. The US will spend less if its allies bear more expense. 

    Trump could not have realized, however, that his moves would have a long-term impact on US military presence on the globe. US allies will increase their defense capability and loosen their military purse strings. Growing military strength will lead to more autonomy, which will be a huge challenge to the US as Washington will need to keep the alliance from splintering. The US will face the dilemma of letting allies be more independent or maintaining cohesion within the alliance. 

    Meanwhile, US dominance of the alliance will weaken. The US acts like a landlord, who collects a lot of money, while holding its head high. Washington's allies will eventually accept Trump's formula, unwillingly though. Particularly, South Korea and Japan may find nationalistic sentiments of their people prevail. 

    The author is an associate professor at the School of International Studies, and a research fellow at the National Academy of Development and Strategy, Renmin University of China. [email protected]

    Posted in: VIEWPOINT

  • 省国资运营公司机关召开党员大会选举产生第一届机关党委委员 2019-08-15
  • 中宣部授予张黎明“时代楷模”称号 2019-08-15
  • 工信部下架46款不良手机APP 2019-08-09
  • 草原生态文化如何传承 2019-08-09
  • 【专题】书记、市长去哪儿 2019-08-02
  • 人工智能机遇与挑战 听听专家怎么说 2019-08-02
  • [网连中国]赛龙舟 包粽子 办诗会……全国各地品民俗迎端午 2019-07-30
  • 国防部回应美舰擅入西沙领海:中国军队当即行动予以驱离 2019-07-25
  • 出租广州市海珠区新港东路磨碟沙大街118号之52号自编C-7A、C-8A、C-6A、C-9A、C-8B、C-6B、C-9B、C-5B、C-10B、C-7B(即自编10栋部分物业) 2019-07-25
  • 挖鼻孔会导致鼻孔变大吗?鼻孔千万别想挖就挖 2019-07-19
  • 香港支付方式日渐丰富(看香港) 2019-07-19
  • 鸟瞰“中国围屋之乡” 造型独特如城堡 2019-07-18
  • 这个问题,不是我们那些学者所讲的,国家崛起美国害怕了。而是美国舞着大棒,配合国内的资本共同讹诈。 2019-07-12
  • 你遇到了吗用户吐槽升iOS 11.4后耗电过快用户吐槽升iOS11后耗电过快-行情资讯 2019-07-12
  • 高校在陕招生出新政 快来看有没有你想报考的学校招生计划高校-西安新闻 2019-06-19
  • 四川时时下载手机版式 澳洲幸运10真假 最新时时技巧 18选7 国标麻将十三张 四川快乐12开奖结果前二组 时时彩后一杀1码100准 江苏十一选五开奖结果查询结果 黑龙江时时分析 一分时时彩是哪开奖